Monday, October 5, 2009

From losing money to profit - NYX

This is an example of the discipline applied on how a real trade was turned from losing money to making profit.

To adjust the trade, the following guidelines were followed:

STAGNANT TREND: - adjust to Call Calendar or Bull Call Calendar

BEARISH Trend

- STOCK NEAR RESISTANCE : synthetic collar

- STOCK NEAR SUPPORT: -à bear call or Calendar Strangle

- STOCK DROPS >20% à Dollar cost average or buy more calls

The following trade followed the above guidelines:

1. NYX Long Call - April 02 buying Jan 09 95 LC( 20 months ) for $22.5




- Trend is bullish
- Trade placed in April 2 for Jan 09 – 20 months for trade to work

2. April 13 - Trend is stagnant



Stagnant - adjust to Call Calendar

- April 13 – Long call -à Call Calendar
- Sell April 95 ( 1 week left before expiration ) for 1.75 and at RESISTANCE
- Note that stock had dropped, MACD had turned but it is not time yet to make a bearish adjustment. Trend was decided to be STAGNANT

Call Expired.

New Cost : 22.5 –1.75 = 21.05 (First cycle of cost reduction )

3. April 20th - earnings next week



Stock starting to trun bearish and near RESISTANCE --> Adjust to SYNTHETIC COLLAR.


o Add protective Put and
o sell a call ( SYNTHETIC COLLAR ) – near RESISTANCE )

- add LP May 90 for 3.1
- add a SC Jan 08 110 FOR $6 ( This is far out in time to get enough credit because EARNINGS IS NEXT WEEK ) .This is easily paid for the put.
- SC is made far out in time as stock had potential to go down


New Cost Basis : 21.05 +3.1 ( put ) –6 (SC ) = 18.15

On Monday, it gap down in high volume ( downgraded and 2 days before earnings )

4. April 30th - gap down after downgrade



Have to do something to May 90 put as it is April 30th ( getting close to support at 77.5 ). Will lose extrinsic value fast. Need another put but further out in time.


- STC May 90 put for 4.5
- BTC Jan 08 110 SC for 4.4


New Cost Basis : 18.15 –4.5 +4.4 = 18.05

Roll the synthetic Collar ( price around 78 and resistance at 90 )


- BTO Jun 85 put = 3.5 ( lower strike and shorter time because price is near support)

- STO May 90 Call = 1.2 ( because price is near support and could have upside potential and thus short term call – so as not to cap the profit )

NOTE:
- PUT is now longer time than SC
- SC is short term because price is at support because you do not want to cap profit


New Cost basis : 18.05 +3.5 –1.2 = 20.35 ( new synthetic collar )

Trade is one month and cost has drop from 22.50 to 16.25 = 6.25without spending any money. Stock has gone from 90 –80.

5. May 18th - stock finding support at 85



- Stock finding support on the first half of May
- BTC on May 20 for May 90 Call = 0 ( call expired )
- Sell June 85 put for 4.1 as put was deemed no longer needed


May 90 SC expired on May 20 = 1.2

New Cost basis : 20.35 – 4.1 +0 = 16.25

Now you have a LC at 95 strike at cost of 16.25 ( no put and SC )

6. May 31st - Stock moves sideway --> adjust to Calendar



- Waited two weeks and stock ding dong around 75-80 ( stagnant )
- STO the 90 June Call = $0.8 ( a cost reduction for a front month with 19 months of time left ). This is converting into a CALL Calendar.

- Call expired worthless on Jun 18th

New Cost basis: 16.25 – 0.8 = 15.45

7. June 18th - Stock broke down



- Stock broke down support on June 18th after option expiration on June 15th
- Instead of buying a PP, sold another SC at Jul 85 for 1.05. The reason is that stock may bounce back from support and this break down may be temporary. Can add PP later.
- STO July 85 call = 1.05


New Cost : 15.45 – 1.05 = 14.4

8. June 20th - stock continued to drop



It went down even more. It is not bouncing up. Forced to add PUT

Add a put Aug 75 on June 20th = 2.75

9 July 10th - Sold the puts



- Beg July stock touching 20 MA, going up 2 days on high volume.

- Get out of the puts on July 10 = 2.3

New cost basis: 14.4 +2,75 –2.3 = 14.85

10 July 24th - Stock went down again after selling put!



- Stock went back down. It was unexpected.
- But stock did not breach support. So use bear call calendar or calendar strangle ( buy puts )
- Since stock has gone down > 20%, it was time to cost average. Also stock is nearing support
- BTO 3 contracts NYX 2009 95 call for 10 ( total 5 contracts now )

o new cost basis: (( 14.85x2) + 19 x3)) /5 = 11.94

- BTO 5 contracts of Sept 75 put converting into a synthetic married put ( long call + put ) or a Calendar strangle. Also, stock was closed to earnings.
o BTO 3 Sept 74 for 4.4
o BTO 2 contract for 3.4

12. August 16th - Stock broke and gapped down



- Sold puts even there was no support or bullish signal. But the MAIN REASON is that the cost of put had gone up a lot from around cost of $4 to $10 = $6 of cost savings
- STC Sept 75 put for $10.42
- Cost was reduce A LOT to only $11.94 – $6 = $5.94
- To increase protection STO Sept 80 Call for 0.92 to reduce cost


11. Sept 21st ( option expiry)




- For the next one month, no trade was made.
- Call expired worthless on Sept 21.
- New Cost basis : 5.94 – 0.92 = 5.02
- Stock went up after option expiry with high volume

MADE over 100% profit on this trade

No comments:

Post a Comment

Visitors to this blog

About Me

An engineer by training graduated with B.Sc (hons) and MBA from Strathclyde university in Glasgow, Scotland. Started as an engineer in R&D for 3 years with Philips. Then, worked with DuPont for 13 years. Last job was VP, Marketing for Asia Pacific. Left to start a number of companies in various segments which include a large electronic distribution, a VoIP provider, an internet trading portal in Australia,and an executive training consultancy firm. Have listed companies in NYSE, Australia Stock Exchange, Singapore Stock Exchange Main Board. I was on the Board of Directors for 1 company listed in Thailand, 1 in Singapore and 1 in Australia. Was in the senior management of a company listed in NYSE. Still holding major share positions in the VoIP and Executive training companies. Both are private companies.

Disclaimer

These articles merely reflect the opinions of this author and are by no means a guarantee of future economic conditions, market or stock performance. Though the author strives to provide accurate and relevant data, he sometimes relies on external sources and cannot assure the reader of the accuracy of these external sources. Additionally, these articles are provided for INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY and are NOT MEANT to provide investment advice to anyone. For investment advice, please consult your professional adviser.